Supreme Court Reflection

The Supreme Court Building located in Washington, DC
Built in 1935

When I first began studying the U.S. Supreme Court, I was astonished at the power these nine justices held—not just over law, but over the very fabric of society. They are the most powerful judges in the world, and their legitimacy stems from the Constitution, while their influence is ultimately rooted in the people they serve. 

The president plays a strategic role in shaping the Court by nominating justices, usually that align with their philosophies and parties. It’s a subtle but significant way to sway future decisions. Yet, once confirmed justices are independent, unable to be swayed by anyone outside of the courtroom, and their decisions often transcend political expectations. 

Chief Justice John Marshal
Justice from 1801-1835

One name that stands out in the Court’s history is Chief Justice John Marshall. His legacy shaped the judiciary into a co-equal branch of government, and his influence still echoes today. But not all decisions have aged well. The infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford case, with Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, stated enslaved people could never be citizens and that Congress lacked the authority to ban slavery—an appalling ruling that underscored the need for constitutional reform. Thankfully, the 14th Amendment later helped correct that injustice, establishing equal protection under the law. 

Each year, the Court receives around 7,000 petitions, but only about 100 cases are granted review. The justices meet weekly to discuss which cases to hear and to vote on decisions. During oral arguments, lawyers are given just 30 minutes to present their case—a brief window to make a lasting impression. What’s fascinating is how differently attorneys argue before the Supreme Court compared to other courts. They’re not just speaking to one judge; they’re addressing nine minds, each with distinct perspectives. 

Communication among justices is often indirect during arguments. They pose questions through the attorneys, signaling their thoughts to one another in a kind of intellectual dialogue. After deliberations, the justices vote, and one is selected to write the Court’s opinion—a document that can shape legal precedent for generations. The official opinion can take months to create and then can be reformed by the other justices. All the opinions from the year are released at the end of the Court’s term before the summer release in either late June or early July.  

Understanding the Supreme Court has deepened my appreciation for the delicate balance of law, power, and principle. It’s a reminder that while the Constitution provides the framework, it’s the people—and those who interpret it—who give it life. 

Documentary Source pt 1

Documentary Source pt 2